ID 553 - Module 4: Objectives and Aligned Assessment

Writing Learning Objectives

Estimated reading time: 30 minutes.

Video: Writing Learning Objectives. Lecture: what objectives are for, Mager's three components and ABCD, observable verbs, and five bad objectives rewritten live. (Instructor: build with make_videos.py or record and embed your own.)

What an objective is for

A learning objective states what the learner will be able to do after instruction, under what conditions, and to what standard. It is written for three audiences at once. It tells the designer what to teach and assess. It tells the learner what success looks like. And it tells the evaluator what to measure. An objective that cannot serve all three is not finished.

Objectives are derived directly from the task analysis: each numbered element above the entry-skill line becomes one or more objectives. That derivation is what keeps instruction tied to performance.

Two formats

Mager's three components

Robert Mager (1962) specified that a useful objective contains:

  1. Performance. What the learner will do, stated with an observable verb.
  2. Conditions. The circumstances under which the performance occurs: tools available, information given, constraints imposed.
  3. Criterion. How well the performance must be done: accuracy, speed, quality, or a standard to match.

Example: Given a patient wristband, a medication order in the EHR, and a handheld scanner (conditions), the nurse will verify patient identity and medication match (performance) with 100% accuracy across ten simulated administrations, including two with mismatch alerts (criterion).

The ABCD format

Heinich and colleagues' ABCD format adds the audience explicitly: Audience, Behavior, Condition, Degree. It is the same information reorganized; many organizations prefer it because it forces the writer to name who the objective is for. Use whichever your context expects, but include all components.

Observable verbs

The verb is the objective. "Understand," "know," "appreciate," and "be familiar with" describe internal states nobody can observe. Replace them with what the learner would do to show the state: list, describe, classify, compare, calculate, demonstrate, perform, diagnose, design, justify.

Bloom's revised taxonomy (Anderson and Krathwohl, 2001) organizes cognitive verbs by complexity:

LevelWhat the learner doesSample verbs
RememberRetrieve factslist, name, recall, identify
UnderstandConstruct meaningdescribe, explain, summarize, classify, compare
ApplyUse a procedureperform, execute, calculate, demonstrate, use
AnalyzeBreak into parts and relate themdifferentiate, organize, diagnose, distinguish
EvaluateJudge against criteriacritique, justify, appraise, recommend
CreatePut elements together into something newdesign, compose, plan, produce

The taxonomy is a vocabulary, not a hierarchy to climb in every lesson. Match the level to the task analysis. If the job requires applying a procedure, an "apply" objective is correct; adding "create" objectives to look rigorous misaligns the instruction.

For Gagné's other domains use verbs suited to them: for motor skills, perform, execute, assemble; for attitudes, choose, volunteer, comply with; for verbal information, state, list, describe.

Writing objectives from the task analysis

  1. Take each element above the entry-skill line.
  2. Decide whether it deserves its own objective or folds into a parent. Rule of thumb: if it will be practiced and assessed separately, it gets an objective.
  3. Write the performance with a verb matched to the outcome type and level.
  4. Add the conditions that will actually be present at assessment and, ideally, on the job.
  5. Add a criterion that reflects the real standard. Not everything is 100%; not everything is "to the instructor's satisfaction."
  6. Number the objective with the task analysis element it came from (for example, Objective 2.1.3).

Terminal and enabling objectives

The terminal objective describes the goal performance; there is usually one per unit of instruction. Enabling objectives describe the subordinate skills that build to it. The hierarchy from your task analysis gives you the structure for free. Learners see the terminal objective and the main enabling objectives; the designer works with all of them.

Common flaws and fixes

Flawed objectiveFlawFixed objective
Students will understand the ADDIE modelUnobservable verb; no conditions or criterionGiven a description of an ID project, students will identify which ADDIE phase each described activity belongs to, with at least 9 of 10 correct
Learners will be familiar with the EHRUnobservable; topic rather than performanceUsing the practice environment, learners will locate a named patient and open the medication administration record within 60 seconds
Participants will learn about accessibilityVerb describes the instruction, not the learnerGiven a short e-learning module, participants will identify all WCAG violations from a list of eight common types
Nurses will administer medicationsMissing conditions and criterion; too broad(Split into the terminal objective and enabling objectives from the task analysis)
Students will write a good essay"Good" is not a criterionStudents will write a 500-word persuasive essay that meets all four criteria on the attached rubric at the proficient level or above

Objectives and motivation

Well-written objectives make relevance visible (Keller's R in ARCS) and give learners a standard to aim at, which supports confidence (C). Share the terminal objective and the assessment criteria with learners at the start of instruction. Hiding the standard helps nobody.

Preparing for the Objective Clinic

Write three objectives from your task analysis: the terminal objective and two enabling objectives. Post them in the clinic for peer critique before you use them in the instructional plan.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning (7th ed.). Merrill.

Mager, R. F. (1997). Preparing instructional objectives (3rd ed.). Center for Effective Performance.