Revise your instructional plan in response to peer review and write a reflection on the design.
Submit the sections of your Part 1 plan that changed as a result of peer review and your own evaluation planning, with changes tracked or highlighted. Include a one-page change log: what changed, which review or insight prompted it, and what you chose not to change and why.
Write 800 to 1,200 words addressing:
One PDF or Google Doc link. APA 7 where sources are cited. AI-use disclosure if applicable. The reflection must be your own writing.
| Criterion | Exemplary | Proficient | Developing | Beginning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revisions and change log (20) | Substantive revisions clearly traced to feedback; reasoned decisions not to change (18 to 20) | Revisions present; log general (14 to 17) | Cosmetic revisions (9 to 13) | None (0 to 8) |
| Model in practice and the analysis chain (15) | Honest, specific account of process versus model; chain traced with evidence of where it held or broke (14 to 15) | Both addressed; one general (11 to 13) | Descriptive only (7 to 10) | Missing (0 to 6) |
| Prototype, priorities, and practice (10) | Specific insights; realistic prioritization; credible personal commitments (9 to 10) | Present; some general (7 to 8) | Vague (4 to 6) | Missing (0 to 3) |
| Writing (5) | Clear, first-person, organized (5) | Minor issues (4) | Several (2 to 3) | Many (0 to 1) |